Recursive Augmented Dickey-Fuller
Wild Bootstrap Critical Values
Also: radf_wb_distr
radf_wb_cv radf_wb_cv(
data,
minw = NULL,
nboot = 500L,
dist_rad = FALSE,
dist_skew = FALSE,
seed = NULL
)
radf_wb_distr(
data,
minw = NULL,
nboot = 500L,
dist_rad = FALSE,
dist_skew = FALSE,
seed = NULL
) radf_wb_cv generates critical values for the recursive unit root tests with the wild bootstrap of Harvey et al. (2016), which is asymptotically robust to non-stationary volatility. radf_wb_distr computes the distribution.
Arguments
| data | A univariate or multivariate numeric time series object, a numeric
vector or matrix, or a data.frame. A column may have leading or trailing
NA values, which describes an unbalanced panel in which series enter or
exit the sample at different times. Those periods are filled with NA in
badf and bsadf and excluded from the adf, sadf and
gsadf of that series. Interior NA values (a gap in the middle of
a series) are not supported. When any series is padded in this way, the panel
statistics (bsadf_panel and gsadf_panel) are not available, and
the function returns NA for them with a warning. |
| minw | A positive integer. The minimum window size (default = , where T denotes the sample size). |
| nboot | A positive integer. Number of bootstraps (default = 500L). |
| dist_rad | Logical. If TRUE then the Rademacher distribution will be used. |
| dist_skew | Logical. If TRUE, use the fixed right-skewed multiplier
distribution of Hafner (2020) instead of the default standard normal or
(dist_rad = TRUE) Rademacher one. It is appropriate when the return
distribution of the series is itself clearly right-skewed, as for the
cryptocurrency returns in the application of that paper. At most one of
dist_rad and dist_skew may be TRUE. |
| seed | An object specifying if and how the random number generator (rng)
should be initialized. It is either NULL or an integer, which is passed to
set.seed before the simulation. If you set it, the value is saved as the
"seed" attribute of the returned value. The default, NULL, leaves the state of
the rng unchanged and returns .Random.seed as the "seed" attribute. Results are
reproducible across the parallel and the non-parallel option when you use the
same seed. |
Value
For radf_wb_cv, a list with the critical values for the ADF, BADF, BSADF and GSADF tests. For radf_wb_distr, a list with the ADF, SADF and GSADF distributions.
Details
The function applies a wild bootstrap re-sampling scheme to construct the bootstrap analogue of the test of Phillips et al. (2015). The bootstrap test is asymptotically robust to non-stationary volatility.
Examples
These examples are copied from the package's own documentation and are run by R CMD check on every release.
The printed output (after #>) and the plots were produced by running them against the current package source.
# Volatility triples half-way through the sample. This is the case of
# non-stationary volatility that the wild bootstrap is built for, and plain
# radf_mc_cv() over-rejects here
y <- sim_psy1(n = 200, seed = 1, e = sim_vol_break(199))
# Default minimum window
wb <- radf_wb_cv(y)
tidy(wb)
#> # A tibble: 3 × 5
#> id sig adf sadf gsadf
#> <fct> <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 series1 90 -0.135 3.82 4.32
#> 2 series1 95 0.276 4.81 5.22
#> 3 series1 99 1.16 6.57 7.24
# Change the minimum window and the number of bootstraps
wb2 <- radf_wb_cv(y, nboot = 600, minw = 20)
tidy(wb2)
#> # A tibble: 3 × 5
#> id sig adf sadf gsadf
#> <fct> <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 series1 90 -0.209 3.98 4.52
#> 2 series1 95 0.0593 5.02 5.37
#> 3 series1 99 0.913 7.01 7.39
# Simulate distribution
wdist <- radf_wb_distr(y)
autoplot(wdist) # Apply the critical values to actual data
rsim_data <- radf(y, minw = 20)
autoplot(rsim_data, cv = wb2) See also
radf_mc_cv for Monte Carlo critical values and radf_sb_cv for sieve bootstrap critical values.
Other critical values: radf_common_cv(), radf_mc_cv(), radf_recovery_cv(), radf_sb_cv(), radf_sbz_cv(), radf_sign_cv(), radf_sign_dm_cv(), radf_tt_cv(), radf_wb_ps_cv()
References
Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J., Sollis, R., & Taylor, A. M. R. (2016). Tests for explosive financial bubbles in the presence of non-stationary volatility. Journal of Empirical Finance, 38(Part B), 548-574.
Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J. (2015). Testing for Multiple Bubbles: Historical Episodes of Exuberance and Collapse in the S&P 500. International Economic Review, 56(4), 1043-1078. 10.1111/iere.12132
Hafner, C. M. (2020). Testing for bubbles in cryptocurrencies with time-varying volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 18(2), 233-249.
exuber